DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24611555·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing about 1 year agoGRANTED with leave to amend

JACKLYN IBAY, ET AL VS. FIVE 88 / MISSION BAY BLOCK 7, ET AL

MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Jul 21, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Strike rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJACKLYN IBAY
DefendantFIVE 88 / MISSION BAY BLOCK 7

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC24611555 - July 21, 2025 Hearing date: July 21, 2025 Case number: CGC24611555 Case title: JACKLYN IBAY, ET AL VS. FIVE 88 / MISSION BAY BLOCK 7, ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24611555 | Case Title: | | JACKLYN IBAY, ET AL VS. FIVE 88 / MISSION BAY BLOCK 7, ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-07-21 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion calendar for July 21, 2025, line 3. Defendant's Motion to Strike Complaint is GRANTED with leave to amend.

The Complaint's allegations do not allege with sufficient particularly each Defendant's mental state and conduct. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share