| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Or In The Alternative Summary Adjudication
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC23610551 - July 29, 2025 Hearing date: July 29, 2025 Case number: CGC23610551 Case title: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION VS. THE TESTATE AND INTESTATE SUCCESSORS OF JULES ET AL Case Number: | | CGC23610551 | Case Title: | | U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION VS. THE TESTATE AND INTESTATE SUCCESSORS OF JULES ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-07-29 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Or In The Alternative Summary Adjudication | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion calendar for July 29, 2025, line 1.
Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment or in the Alternative Summary Adjudication is CONTINUED to August 5, 2025 at 9:30 am for moving party to comply with SFLR 2.7B and provide courtesy copies of the moving papers and reply no later than July 30, 2025 with a cover letter reflecting new hearing date. The Court notes that it already ordered the moving party to provide courtesy copies of the original motion by July 18, 2025 and moving party failed to do so. =(501/GLW)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”