DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC23610551·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing about 1 year agoOFF CALENDAR

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION VS. THE TESTATE AND INTESTATE SUCCESSORS OF JULES ET AL

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Or In The Alternative Summary Adjudication

Hearing date
Aug 5, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Judgment rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffU.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
DefendantTHE TESTATE AND INTESTATE SUCCESSORS OF JULES ET AL

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC23610551 - August 5, 2025 Hearing date: August 5, 2025 Case number: CGC23610551 Case title: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION VS. THE TESTATE AND INTESTATE SUCCESSORS OF JULES ET AL Case Number: | | CGC23610551 | Case Title: | | U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION VS. THE TESTATE AND INTESTATE SUCCESSORS OF JULES ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-08-05 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Or In The Alternative Summary Adjudication | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion calendar for August 5, 2025, line 2.

Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment or in the Alternative Summary Adjudication is OFF CALENDAR. The Court has twice ordered the moving party to provide courtesy copies of the original Motion for Summary Judgment and has failed to do so. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share