DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC23608726·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing about 1 year agoOFF CALENDAR

AVI EDRI VS. TAMAR RACHEL KASSOFF-SOFIOV ET AL

Motion To Enforce Settlement Agreement Pursuant To Code Of Civil Procedures 664.6

Hearing date
Jul 17, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffAVI EDRI
DefendantTAMAR RACHEL KASSOFF-SOFIOV

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC23608726 - July 17, 2025 Hearing date: July 17, 2025 Case number: CGC23608726 Case title: AVI EDRI VS. TAMAR RACHEL KASSOFF-SOFIOV ET AL Case Number: | | CGC23608726 | Case Title: | | AVI EDRI VS. TAMAR RACHEL KASSOFF-SOFIOV ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-07-17 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion To Enforce Settlement Agreement Pursuant To Code Of Civil Procedures 664.6 And Supporting Declarations | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion calendar for July 17, 2025, line 2.

Defendant's Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement Pursuant to CCP 664.6 is OFF CALENDAR for failure to comply with LRSF 2.7B and provide courtesy copies of the moving papers. The Court also notes that it received courtesy copies of "Plaintiff's Response" to this motion, but this "Response" was not filed with the Court. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share