DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24619520·sf·Civil·Discovery Dispute
Hearing about 1 year agoDENIED

LORI REESE-BROWN VS. JOHN E COWAN

Amended Notice Of Motion To Compel Disclosure Of Insurance Information; Defendant's motion for sanctions

Hearing date
Jun 30, 2025
Department
302
Prevailing
Mixed

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffLORI REESE-BROWN
DefendantJOHN E COWAN

Ruling

Matter on calendar for Monday, June 30, 2025, Line 7, PLAINTIFF LORI REESE-BROWN's Amended Notice Of Motion To Compel Disclosure Of Insurance Information.

2 - Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Disclosure of Insurance Information is DENIED.

On April 24, 2025, the court granted Plaintiff's motion pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 1281.4 to stay the proceedings pending completion of the arbitration. Once such a stay is issued, discovery disputes are heard not by the court, but the arbitrator. (See Cinel v. Christopher (2012) 203 Cal.App.4th 759, 769.) Thus, this motion, which seeks adjudication of a discovery dispute, is denied.

Defendant's motion for sanctions is denied.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/JMQ). | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share