Motion To Compel Compliance With Deposition Subpoenas For Production Of Business Records
Set for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar on Friday, July 31, 2026, Line 3.
1 - Plaintiff Michelle Fuller's Motion To Compel Compliance With Deposition Subpoenas For Production Of Business Records is DENIED.
Plaintiff's motion is denied on several independent grounds. First, Plaintiff's motion is impermissibly stacked. If the motion were not denied on other grounds, the court would order it off calendar. Second, Plaintiff fails to identify any legal authority-statutory or otherwise-supporting her motion or request for relief. Third, Plaintiff's memorandum does not contain a single record citation or reference. The court declines to search through the record on this motion for evidence that might support Plaintiff's contentions.
Fourth, Plaintiff failed to provide a separate statement. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1345.) Plaintiff's failure is not excused. The motion is largely unintelligible. The motion's intelligibility may have been improved had Plaintiff provided a separate statement, but she declined to do so. Fifth, Plaintiff failed to demonstrate the discovery requests at issue are reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. (See Code of Civil Procedure section 2017.010.) Sixth, any marginal relevance is substantially outweighed by the overbreadth of the requests and the undue burden imposed upon the third parties.
Further, the record shows that the requests burden third party privacy interests and Plaintiff has not demonstrated her need or interest in the materials outweighs those privacy interests.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address.
=(302/JMQ) | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”