DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25629608·sf·Civil·Discovery Dispute
Hearing 3 months agoSet for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar on Tuesday, May 20, 2026, Line 8.

ROBERT BETANCORT VS. MILLER KELLEY ARCHITECTS, INC. ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Plaintiff S Further Responses To Special Interrogatories, Set Two, And Request For Sanctions

Hearing date
May 20, 2026
Department
302
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffROBERT BETANCORT
DefendantMILLER KELLEY ARCHITECTS, INC.
DefendantMARK MILLER

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 302 - CGC25629608 - May 20, 2026 Hearing date: May 20, 2026 Case number: CGC25629608 Case title: ROBERT BETANCORT VS. MILLER KELLEY ARCHITECTS, INC. ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25629608 | Case Title: | | ROBERT BETANCORT VS. MILLER KELLEY ARCHITECTS, INC. ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-05-20 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Plaintiff S Further Responses To Special Interrogatories, Set Two, And Request For Sanctions | Rulings: | | Set for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar on Tuesday, May 20, 2026, Line 8. DEFENDANTs MILLER KELLEY ARCHITECTS, INC., and MARK MILLER's Motion To Compel Plaintiff S Further Responses To Special Interrogatories, Set Two, And Request For Sanctions. (Please check the San Francisco Court website at 3:00 PM for the full tentative ruling) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share