DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25629608·sf·Civil·Discovery Dispute
Hearing about 1 month agoSet for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar on Thursday, July 09, 2026, Line 8.

ROBERT BETANCORT VS. MILLER KELLEY ARCHITECTS, INC. ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Plaintiffs Deposition And Compel Plaintiff To Answer Specified Questions And Request For Sanctions

Hearing date
Jul 9, 2026
Department
302
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffROBERT BETANCORT
DefendantMILLER KELLEY ARCHITECTS, INC. DOING BUSINESS AS MKTHINK
DefendantMARK MILLER

Ruling

Set for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar on Thursday, July 09, 2026, Line 8. DEFENDANTs MILLER KELLEY ARCHITECTS, INC. DOING BUSINESS AS MKTHINK, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, MARK MILLER Motion To Compel Plaintiffs Deposition And Compel Plaintiff To Answer Specified Questions And Request For Sanctions. (The full tentative ruling will be available on the San Francisco Superior Court website today after 3:00 p.m.) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share