DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
21CV388088·santaclara·Civil·Civil
Hearing in about 1 hourOFF CALENDAR

Heather Rhines v. Michael H. Scott, et al.

Motion to Compel Further Responses to RFPs, Set One, and for Sanctions

Hearing date
Sep 11, 2026
Department
16
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffHeather Rhines
DefendantMichael H. Scott
DefendantSierra Corporate Management, Inc.

Ruling

9:00 21CV388088 Heather Rhines Order on Defendant Sierra Corporate 2 v. Management, Inc.’s Motion to Michael H. Scott, et al. Compel Further Responses to RFPs, Set One, and for Sanctions

In light of the Notice of Settlement of Entire Case filed by Plaintiff on the eve of trial on September 8, 2026, this Motion is OFF CALENDAR.

SO ORDERED.

9:00 24CV442743 MV Campbell, LLC Order on Plaintiff’s Motion to 3 v. Compel Defendants to Respond to MOD Super Fast Pizza Plaintiff’s Discovery Requests (California), LLC, et al. and for Sanctions

See Line 3 below for complete tentative ruling.

After the hearing, the Court will prepare and file the formal Order.

9:00 24CV436896 Hassan Abpikar, et al. Order on Defendant State Farm 4 v. General Insurance Company’s State Farm Insurance, et al. Motion for Terminating Sanctions Or, Alternatively, Issue and Monetary Sanctions

See Line 4 below for complete tentative ruling.

After the hearing, the Court will prepare and file the formal Order.

Line 2 Case Name: Heather Rhines v. Michael H. Scott, et al.

Case No.: 21CV388088

See ORDER above. (In light of the Notice of Settlement of Entire Case filed by Plaintiff on the eve of trial on September 8, 2026, this Motion is OFF CALENDAR.)

11

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share