DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV472081·santaclara·Civil·Discovery
Hearing in about 4 hoursOFF CALENDAR

Shan Allen Laliberte, et al. v. F.S. Trucking Company, et al.

Motion to Compel Discovery

Hearing date
Sep 4, 2026
Department
16
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffShan Allen Laliberte
DefendantF.S. Trucking Company
DefendantDaniel Bonilla Estacio

Ruling

9:01 5

9:00 25CV475065 Chandra Bambah Order on Defendant Google LLC’s 1 v. Demurrer to Plaintiff’s First Google LLC d/b/a YouTube, Amended Complaint et al. See Line 1 below for complete tentative ruling.

After the hearing, the Court will prepare and file the formal Order.

9:00 25CV480264 Lee Drone Order on Defendant Ian Goodman’s 2 v. Motion to Quash Service of Summons Peter D. Bear, et al. See Line 2 below for complete tentative ruling.

After the hearing, the Court will prepare and file the formal Order.

9:00 25CV483126 Fanbo Zhang Order on Defendant Wen Luo’s 3 v. Anti-SLAPP Motion to Strike the Wen Luo, et al. Complaint and for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs

See Line 3 below for complete tentative ruling.

After the hearing, the Court will prepare and file the formal Order. 9:00 25CV472081 Shan Allen Laliberte, et al. Order on Plaintiff Laliberte’s Motion 4 v. to Compel Defendant Daniel Bonilla F.S. Trucking Company, et al. Estacio to Respond to Plaintiff’s Requests for Production of Documents, Set One, and for Sanctions

At the request of the moving party, this Motion is OFF CALENDAR.

SO ORDERED.

Line 4 Case Name: Shan Allen Laliberte, et al. v. F.S. Trucking Company, et al.

Case No.: 25CV472081

See ORDER above. (At the request of the moving party, this Motion is OFF CALENDAR.)

31

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share