Estate of Barbara T Hacker

adult children, and adult grandchildren). No Proof of Service is on file.

Confidential Conservatorship Care Plan (Forms GC-355 and GC-356) (Prob. Code, Sec. 2351.2, 2352.5.) Conservators must file Forms GC-355 and GC-356 showing specific details about where the conservatee lives or has been temporarily placed, the level of care necessary to provide for the conservatee's needs, the medical condition and treatment of the conservatee, as well as any plan to return the conservatee to their primary place of residence from a temporary care placement.

PLEASE NOTE: Form GC-355 completely changed as of January 1, 2025 due to the passing of SB280, and GC-356 was newly created as a result of that law. The GC-355 form you submit must be the form revised on January 1, 2025. Please also be aware that Form GC-356 must be submitted in all cases, unless a first-degree relative is appointed a limited conservator and must include confidential medical information in response to paragraph 4 of GC-355 (at 4a or 4b) . No earlier iteration of form GC-355 is acceptable to fulfil this duty. No current Form GC-355 is on file.

Inventory & Appraisal (Form GC-040) (Prob. Code, Sec. 2610). The conservator must file an inventory and appraisal of the estate, made as of the date of the appointment of the guardian or conservator.

Proof of Service - Notice of How to File Objection to I & A (Form GC-042) (Prob. Code, Sec. 2610) A copy of the Inventory & Appraisal (Form GC-040), along with Notice of How to File Objection to I & A (Form GC-042), must be delivered to the conservatee's spouse or registered domestic partner, the conservatee's relatives in the first degree, and, if there are no such relatives, to the next closest relative, unless the court determines that the delivery will result in harm to the conservatee.

Proof of Recording Letters of Conservatorship (Prob. Code, Sec. 2313). A conservator of the estate shall record a certified copy of the letters with the county recorder's office in each county in which the conservatee owns an interest in real property, including a security interest. The conservator shall record the letters as soon as practicable after they are issued, but no later than 90 days after the conservator is appointed.

PLEASE NOTE: Failure to submit the required documents listed in the previous Conservator Compliance Order is a breach of fiduciary duty as a conservator, and can result in removal as conservator and surcharge. (Prob. Code, Sec. 2650(c).) If you are removed from office, a successor conservator will be appointed and will be entitled to collect fees. The death of the conservatee does not relieve a conservator of the duty to cure the deficiencies from the previous hearings.

Tentative Ruling: Estate of Barbara T Hacker Tentative Ruling: Estate of Barbara T Hacker Case Number

Case Type Trust Hearing Date / Time Mon, 08/24/2026 - 08:30 Nature of Proceedings Petition to Determine Claim to Property Tentative Ruling Probate Notes: Appearances required. Any Respondents desirous to object must file a written objection before the next hearing. The court has authority to require all objectors to file a written objection pursuant CRC, Rule 7.801, or else deem the failure to do so a waiver.

The petition is recommended for approval, absent objection, for the following reasons: California Rules of Evidence allow the existence and contents of a writing that has been lost or destroyed to be proved by secondary evidence. (Evid. Code, Sec.1521.)

If the trust instrument has been lost or destroyed, and no copy is available after reasonable efforts to procure one have failed (Evid. Code, Sec. 1523, subd. (c)(1)), the party relying on the trust instrument may prove its loss or destruction and then prove its contents by other evidence, often oral testimony, as long as there is no indication that the instrument was fraudulently destroyed (Evid. Code, Sec. 1523, subd. (b)).

If the "material terms" of the trust become contested, "the court shall exclude secondary evidence of the content of writing..." (Evid. Code, Sec. 1521, subd. (a)(1).)

The primary authority on lost instruments is discussed at length in Dart Industries, Inc. v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. (2002) 28 Cal.4th 1059. The rule re: suspicion is there cited as "If any suspicion hangs over the instrument, or that it is designedly withheld, a rigid inquiry should be made into the reasons for its non-production." (Id. at p. 1069.)

In this case, suspicion hangs over the trust instrument. The facts before the Court show that one of three children lives in the family home that is held in trust on title, and has there lived for several years, up to and throughout the time the settlor of the trust passed away. This presumably gave the child occupying the home direct access to Decedent's estate planning documents, because such documents are usually stored in the home. At minimum, that child bears the burden of proving the trust is lost or destroyed and the burden of proving its contents by other evidence. (Evid. Code, Sec.1523, subd. (d).)

However, the facts also show that child has a distinct interest in remaining in the home, claims to have a life estate in said home according to terms in the trust, and now refuses to turn over the trust instrument to his siblings, or cooperate in the investigation for said instrument in any meaningful way. Thus, that child not only has a motive to destroy the trust instrument if any clause did not benefit the child, but also has shown suspect behavior hostile towards the inheritance rights of his siblings.

Therefore, the Court should not only find that suspicion hangs over the non-availability of the trust, but if the trust instrument cannot be produced, the Court should find that the trust's material terms are contested and exclude all secondary evidence of the trust and its terms, leading to a finding that the trust fails and the Decedent died intestate.

Due to staffing limitations, processing times may be delayed. To assist in processing, attorneys and parties should include the next court date in the "Filing Description" field provided by the electronic service provider. That field is also used for further descriptions of the document being e-filed, so be sure to put the calendar date FIRST in the field - BEFORE any further description of the document being e-filed (e.g.: 06/28/16 For XYZ).

Tentative Ruling: Estate of Barbara T Hacker Tentative Ruling: Estate of Barbara T Hacker Case Number

Case Type Decedent's Estate Hearing Date / Time Mon, 07/27/2026 - 08:28 Nature of Proceedings Petition for Letters of Administration Tentative Ruling Probate Notes: Appearances required.

On April 16, 2026, Wade and Bret Slocum filed a Petition for Letters of Administration requesting that both of them be appointed administrators of the Decedent, Barabra T. Hacker's estate.

On June 12, 2026, Jeffrey Slocum filed written objection to that petition, and a competing petition for appointment as administrator, which received written objection on July 15, 2026. This places the matter at issue, requiring evidentiary hearing to resolve. (In re Estate of Lensch (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 667, 676; Conservatorship of Farrant (2021) 67 Cal.App.5th 370, 377.)