DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26PR00195·santabarbara·Civil·Decedent's Estate
Hearing 23 days agoEvidentiary hearing required

Estate of Barbara T Hacker

Petition for Letters of Administration

Hearing date
Jul 27, 2026
Department
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerWade Slocum
PetitionerBret Slocum
OtherJeffrey Slocum

Ruling

Case Number

Case Type Decedent's Estate Hearing Date / Time Mon, 07/27/2026 - 08:28 Nature of Proceedings Petition for Letters of Administration Tentative Ruling Probate Notes: Appearances required. On April 16, 2026, Wade and Bret Slocum filed a Petition for Letters of Administration requesting that both of them be appointed administrators of the Decedent, Barabra T. Hacker's estate. On June 12, 2026, Jeffrey Slocum filed written objection to that petition, and a competing petition for appointment as administrator, which received written objection on July 15, 2026.

This places the matter at issue, requiring evidentiary hearing to resolve. (In re Estate of Lensch (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 667, 676; Conservatorship of Farrant (2021) 67 Cal.App.5th 370, 377.) The following must be submitted: Trust Instrument. The Petition and/or accompanying documents reveal the existence of a trust. A copy of the trust, and all accompanying amendments, must be submitted for review, to ensure compliance with the Decedent's testamentary intent and notice to individuals who might otherwise not be given notice. (Local Rule, 1791(c).)

Tentative Ruling: Conservatorship of Laurie Renee Williams Tentative Ruling: Conservatorship of Laurie Renee Williams

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share