Rideout, Jazzmin vs. First Pitch Entertainment, LLC et al

Case No.: VCU329435 Date: September 10, 2026 Time: 8:30 A.M. Dept. 1-The Honorable David C. Mathias Motion: (1) Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Further Responses as to Special Interrogatories, Set One as to Defendant First Pitch (2) Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Further Responses as to Requests for Production of Documents Nos. 1-2, 11-14, 21, 51, 55-56, and 59, Set One as to Defendant First Pitch (3) Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Compliance as to Requests for Production Nos. 4-6, 8, 10, 15, 24-34, 38, 43-45, 52-53, 60, 62-63 as to Defendant First Pitch (4) Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Initial Responses as to Special Interrogatories, Set Two as to Defendant First Pitch

Tentative Ruling: (1) through (4): There are no tentative rulings on the merits for these motions. The parties are directed to meaningfully meet and confer before the hearing of these motions to resolve the discovery disputes identified in the moving and opposition papers for these discovery motions.

If unable to resolve, counsel are directed to personally appear for the hearing on these discovery motions. No CourtCall or Zoom appearances will be permitted if the parties are unable to resolve this matter prior to the scheduled hearing.

If no one requests oral argument, under Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5(a) and California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will become the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order.

Court reporters are usually not available for law and motion matters in the civil division. The parties and counsel must provide their own reporter if they want a transcript of the proceedings.

Re: City of Exeter vs. Clark, Josie Bell Young