JISOO YOO ET AL VS. POST-MONTGOMERY ASSOCIATES, A CALIFORNAIA GENERAL ET AL
DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT
Motion type
Causes of action
Monetary amounts referenced
Parties
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC23611061 - September 10, 2026 Hearing date: September 10, 2026 Case number: CGC23611061 Case title: JISOO YOO ET AL VS. POST-MONTGOMERY ASSOCIATES, A CALIFORNAIA GENERAL ET AL Case Number: | | CGC23611061 | Case Title: | | JISOO YOO ET AL VS. POST-MONTGOMERY ASSOCIATES, A CALIFORNAIA GENERAL ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-09-10 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | On the Real Property / Housing Motion calendar for September 10, 2026, line 3.
Defendant's Demurrer to Third Amended Complaint is SUSTAINED in part and OVERRULED in part. Demurrer is sustained with leave to amend as to the elder abuse causes of action for Plaintiffs to allege that Plaintiffs did not owe under the lease as of July 15, 2025 at least $262,729.73. This is the amount that is alleged to have been paid and retained by the Defendants. Demurrrer is otherwise overruled. All other causes of action are sufficiently stated. The Court notes that Plainitff should have sought leave to file a supplemental complaint before adding a cause of action for elder abuse by Julie Yoo. The Court further notes that Defendants again cited trial court decisions in support of their arguments. (Demurrer 6:26-7:3). =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”