DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CIVSB2329476·sanbernardino·Civil·Insurance
Hearing todayGRANTED

Aspire General Insurance Company v. Perla Lopez Salazar, et al

Compel Productions of Documents; Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories

Hearing date
Sep 10, 2026
Department
R12
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffAspire General Insurance Company
DefendantPerla Lopez Salazar
DefendantDiana Marie Castro

Ruling

TENTATIVE RULING FOR SEPTEMBER 10, 2026 Department R12 - Judge Kory Mathewson Aspire General Insurance Company v. Perla Lopez Salazar, et al – CIVSB2329476 Motion: (1) Compel Productions of Documents (2) Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories Movant: Plaintiff, Aspire General Insurance Company Respondent: Defendants Perla Lopez Salazar, Diana Marie Castro Ruling: (1), (2) Motion for Production of Documents and Form Interrogatories is GRANTED. Defendants are Ordered to serve verified, code-compliant responses to Plaintiff's Demand for Production of Documents and Form Interrogatories, without objections, within 15 days of the Court's order, and to produce all responsive documents.

Sanctions are DENIED for failure to properly notice the request for Sanctions pursuant to CCP 2023.040 and CRC 2.111. Plaintiffs to provide Order and give notice. ______________________________________________________________________________ Plaintiff served a Demand for Production of Documents and Form Interrogatories on Defendants on April 28, 2025. Responses were due by May 28, 2025. Defendants have not served responses. Despite repeated meet-and-confer correspondence from Plaintiff's counsel demanding responses and warning of a forthcoming motions to compel, Defendants have failed to serve responses.

Therefore, the motions to compel production of documents and form interrogatories is granted.

Dated: September 10, 2026

____________________________ Judge Kory Mathewson

1

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share