GAETA vs LUCID GROUP USA, INC.
Motion to Compel Arbitration
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
26CV178384: GAETA vs LUCID GROUP USA, INC. 09/10/2026 Hearing on Motion to Compel Arbitration filed by Lucid Group USA, Inc. (Defendant) CRS# 367905008062 in Department 520
Tentative Ruling - 09/09/2026 Jamilah A. Jefferson
Motion to Compel Arbitration CONTINUED TO October 30, 2026 in light of the Court's internal calendaring constraints.
The Hearing on Motion to Compel Arbitration filed by Lucid Group USA, Inc. (Defendant) CRS# 367905008062 scheduled for 09/10/2026 is continued to 10/30/2026 at 10:45 AM in Department 520 at Hayward Hall of Justice.
NOTICE: This tentative ruling will automatically become the courts final order on September 10, 2026 unless, by no later than 4:00 P.M. on September 9, 2026, a party to the action notifies BOTH: 1) the court by emailing Dept520@alameda.courts.ca.gov; AND 2) all opposing counsel or self- represented parties (by telephone or email) that the party is contesting this tentative ruling.
The subject line (RE:) of the email must state: Request for CONTESTED HEARING: [the case name], [number]. When a party emails to contest a tentative ruling, the party must identify the specific holding(s) within the ruling they wish to contest via oral argument.
The court does not provide court reporters for hearings in civil departments. A party who wants a record of the proceedings must engage a private court reporter. (Local Rule 3.95.) Any privately retained court reporter must also participate via video conference. Their email must be provided to the court at the time the Notice of Contest is emailed.
ALL CONTESTED LAW AND MOTION HEARINGS ARE CONDUCTED VIA REMOTE VIDEO unless an in person appearance is required by the court. Invitations to participate in the video proceeding will be sent by the court upon receipt of timely notice of contest. A party may give email notice that they will appear in court in person for the hearing, however all other counsel/parties and the JUDGE MAY APPEAR REMOTELY.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”