DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV156671·alameda·Civil·Employment
Hearing todayCONTINUED

AHDOOT vs TESLA, INC.

Motion to Compel Arbitration

Hearing date
Sep 2, 2026
Department
19
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Sep 9, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffAHDOOT
DefendantTESLA, INC.

Ruling

25CV156671: AHDOOT vs TESLA, INC. 09/02/2026 Hearing on Motion to Compel Arbitration filed by TESLA, INC. (Defendant) CRS# 375436018563 in Department 19

Tentative Ruling - 08/28/2026 Joscelyn Jones

The Hearing on Motion to Compel Arbitration filed by TESLA, INC. (Defendant) CRS# 375436018563 scheduled for 08/19/2026 is continued to 09/09/2026 at 03:00 PM in Department 19 at Rene C. Davidson Courthouse.

Defendant's Motion to Compel Binding Arbitration is CONTINUED to September 9, 2026 at 3:00 p.m. in Department 19.

This motion was previously scheduled for hearing on August 19. It was continued to September 2 because Department 19 did not receive courtesy copies of the moving, opposition, or reply (if any) papers, as required by Alameda County Superior Court Local Rules, Rule 3.30(c).

The Court’s order continuing the hearing to September 2 directed the parties to deliver courtesy copies of their respective moving, opposition, and reply (if any) papers to Department 19 no later than August 19.

Department 19 still has not received the courtesy copies of these papers.

The parties are ordered to deliver courtesy copies of their respective moving, opposition, and reply (if any) papers to Department 19 no later Noon than September 2.

If the parties fail to do so, the Court will drop this motion from the September 9 calendar.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share