KRISTIN KAMINSKI-WADLE V. DANE WADLE
Request for Order for change of venue
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 September 10, 2026 8:30 a.m./1:30 p.m.
12. KRISTIN KAMINSKI-WADLE V. DANE WADLE 23FL0536
Petitioner filed a Request for Order (RFO) on July 14, 2026, requesting a change in venue from El Dorado County to Placer County. Respondent was personally served in accordance with Family Code section 215, though it does not appear Respondent was served with a blank FL-320.
Respondent has not filed a Responsive Declaration to the RFO.
The court drops the matter from calendar due to the lack of proper service.
TENTATIVE RULING #12: THE MATTER IS DROPPED FROM CALENDAR DUE TO THE LACK OF PROPER SERVICE.
ANY REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT WILL BE HEARD AT 8:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT 5.
NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY PHONE CALL TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6725 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999). NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY PHONE CALL OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”