KENNETH CROMPTON V. DAYNA CROMPTON
Request for Order for modification of custody
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 September 10, 2026 8:30 a.m./1:30 p.m.
11. KENNETH CROMPTON V. DAYNA CROMPTON 23FL0077
Respondent filed a Request for Order (RFO) on March 17, 2026, requesting a modification of the current child custody and parenting plan orders. The parties were referred to Child Custody Recommending Counseling (CCRC) with an appointment on April 16, 2026, and a review hearing on June 11, 2026. There is no Proof of Service showing Petitioner and Minors’ Counsel were properly served.
Only Respondent appeared at the CCRC appointment. A single parent report was filed with the court on April 20, 2026. Copies were mailed to the parties the same day.
Parties appeared for the originally scheduled hearing on June 11, 2026. Respondent requested the matter be continued to effectuate service.
The court granted the request and rereferred the parties to CCRC. The court set a further review hearing for September 10, 2026, at 1:30 PM in Department 5.
Once again only Respondent appeared at the CCRC appointment, despite Petitioner being present in court when the CCRC appointment was set and agreed to the date being available. A single parent report was prepared on July 23, 2026, and served on parties on July 24th.
Petitioner filed a Declaration on September 2, 2026. It was served on Minors’ Counsel the same day. The court finds this to be late filed and not properly served, therefore, the court has not considered it.
Upon review of the court file, there is no Proof of Service after the June 11, 2026 hearing showing Petitioner and Minors’ Counsel were properly served.
The court drops the matter from calendar due to the lack of proper service.
All prior orders remain in full force and effect.
TENTATIVE RULING #11: THE MATTER IS DROPPED FROM CALENDAR DUE TO THE LACK OF PROPER SERVICE. ALL PRIOR ORDERS REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.
ANY REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT WILL BE HEARD AT 8:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT 5.
NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY PHONE CALL TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6725 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE
LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 September 10, 2026 8:30 a.m./1:30 p.m.
TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999). NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY PHONE CALL OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”