DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25678956·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing 11 months agoHearing Required

650 ELLIS I7, LP VS. MARCOS CHOMINA ET AL

Motion for Summary Judgment

Hearing date
Sep 17, 2025
Department
505
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Judgment rulings statewide →

Parties

Plaintiff650 ELLIS I7, LP
DefendantMARCOS CHOMINA

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25678956 - September 17, 2025 Hearing date: September 17, 2025 Case number: CUD25678956 Case title: 650 ELLIS I7, LP VS. MARCOS CHOMINA ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25678956 | Case Title: | | 650 ELLIS I7, LP VS. MARCOS CHOMINA ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-09-17 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT | Rulings: | | On the Real Property/Housing Court motion calendar for September 17, 2025, line 7. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment.

Hearing Required. This matter will be heard by the Honorable Michelle Tong at 1:30 pm in D505. =(505/MT) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: Meeting ID: 160 4132 4666 Passcode: 872834; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 4132 4666; Password: 872834). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share