DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD26682786·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing todayOFF CALENDAR

FIVE ELEMENTS, LLC VS. NORTH STAR PARKING, LLC ET AL

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Hearing date
Sep 9, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Judgment rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffFIVE ELEMENTS, LLC
DefendantNORTH STAR PARKING, LLC

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26682786 - September 9, 2026 Hearing date: September 9, 2026 Case number: CUD26682786 Case title: FIVE ELEMENTS, LLC VS. NORTH STAR PARKING, LLC ET AL Case Number: | | CUD26682786 | Case Title: | | FIVE ELEMENTS, LLC VS. NORTH STAR PARKING, LLC ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-09-09 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT | Rulings: | | On the Real Property / Housing Motion calendar for September 9, 2026, line 15. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is OFF CALENDAR.

Notice of withdrawal on file. =(501/MT) Parties may appear in-person, or via Zoom Video Conference (Meeting ID: 160 4132 4666 Passcode: 872834). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share