DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25678949·sf·Civil·Unlawful Detainer
Hearing about 1 year agoOVERRULED, 5 days to answer.

JAMES CHENG VS. ELENA LAUCHUNG-NACARINO ET AL

Amended DEMURRER to COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Aug 5, 2025
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PlaintiffJAMES CHENG
DefendantELENA LAUCHUNG-NACARINO

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25678949 - August 5, 2025 Hearing date: August 5, 2025 Case number: CUD25678949 Case title: JAMES CHENG VS. ELENA LAUCHUNG-NACARINO ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25678949 | Case Title: | | JAMES CHENG VS. ELENA LAUCHUNG-NACARINO ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-08-05 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Amended DEMURRER to COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion calendar for August 5, 2025, line 8.

Defendant's Amended Demurrer to Complaint is OVERRULED, 5 days to answer. The Complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action for unlawful detainer. Specifically, attachment 10c states sufficient facts to support the allegation that the notices were served on defendant. On demurrer, the facts alleged on the face of the Complaint must be taken as true. The Complaint alleges on its face how and when the notices were served. The additional box checked at 10a does not negate the sufficiency of facts stated elsewhere on the pleading. =(501/SKF)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share