MARK GIRAUDO VS. KATHERINE M. PAPAGEORGE ET AL
Notice Of Motion And Motion To Set Aside July 30, 2026 Default As Void Under Code Of Civil Procedure Section 473(D), Or Alternatively Under Section 473(B); To Preserve Status Quo Pending Determination; And For Related Relief
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26681158 - September 9, 2026 Hearing date: September 9, 2026 Case number: CUD26681158 Case title: MARK GIRAUDO VS. KATHERINE M. PAPAGEORGE ET AL Case Number: | | CUD26681158 | Case Title: | | MARK GIRAUDO VS. KATHERINE M. PAPAGEORGE ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-09-09 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Set Aside July 30, 2026 Default As Void Under Code Of Civil Procedure Section 473(D), Or Alternatively Under Section 473(B); To Preserve Status Quo Pending Determination; And For Related Relief | Rulings: | | On the Real Property / Housing Motion calendar for September 9, 2026, line 10.
Defendants' Motion to Set Aside July 30, 2026 Default as Void under CCP 473(d), or alternatively under CCP 473(b); the Preserve Status Quo Pending Determination; and for Related Relief is continued to September 15, 2026 for the moving party to comply with LRSF 2.7B and provide courtesy copies of the moving papers no later than September 10, 2026 with a cover letter reflecting the new hearing date. (Opposition received.) =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.
A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”