DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25678451·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing about 2 months agoCONTINUED

MICHAEL YANCEY VS. IDRIS PIPPINS ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Defendant'S Motion To Vacate And Set Aside Facially Void Clerk'S Default And Default Judgment [Ccp 473(D)]

Hearing date
Jul 2, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jul 16, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMICHAEL YANCEY
DefendantIDRIS PIPPINS

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25678451 - July 2, 2026 Hearing date: July 2, 2026 Case number: CUD25678451 Case title: MICHAEL YANCEY VS. IDRIS PIPPINS ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25678451 | Case Title: | | MICHAEL YANCEY VS. IDRIS PIPPINS ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-07-02 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Defendant'S Motion To Vacate And Set Aside Facially Void Clerk'S Default And Default Judgment [Ccp 473(D)] | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 2, 2026. Line 5.

DEFENDANT IDRIS PIPPINS Motion To Vacate And Set Aside Facially Void Clerk'S Default And Default Judgment [Ccp 473(D)] is CONTINUED to July 16, 2026, for the opposing party to comply with LRSF 2.7B and provide courtesy copies of the opposition papers no later than July 2, 2026 with a cover letter reflecting the new hearing date. (Moving papers received.) =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share