| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Motion for Summary Judgment
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25678649 - August 15, 2025 Hearing date: August 15, 2025 Case number: CUD25678649 Case title: STEVENSON LOFTS SF LLC VS. STUART GRANT ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25678649 | Case Title: | | STEVENSON LOFTS SF LLC VS. STUART GRANT ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-08-15 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Motion calendar for August 15, 2025, line 9.
Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Based upon the undisputed facts, plaintiff will not be able to obtain a judgment for possession of the real property defined in the Complaint. This is not a trivial defect, as the Complaint defines the relief plaintiff seeks in this summary proceeding, and any judgment rendered in this action must pertain to the real property described in the Complaint.
Plaintiff also raises a number of procedural arguments in opposition, but those arguments are all either based upon factual assertions for which plaintiff provides no evidentiary support, or rules and statutes which do not apply to this unlawful detainer action. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”