| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Further Responses From Defendant To Plaintiff'S Request For Production Of Documents And Request For Monetary Sanctions
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25678491 - August 13, 2025 Hearing date: August 13, 2025 Case number: CUD25678491 Case title: IAN WALLACE VS. ROSHINI PILLAY ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25678491 | Case Title: | | IAN WALLACE VS. ROSHINI PILLAY ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-08-13 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Further Responses From Defendant To Plaintiff'S Request For Production Of Documents And Request For Monetary Sanctions | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Motion calendar for August 13, 2025, line 11.
Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Further Responses from Defendant to Plaintiff's Request for Production of Documents and Request for Monetary Sanctions is MOOT. Defendant served further responses to the request for production after this motion was filed. Sanctions requested by both parties are denied. =(501/SKF)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”