DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CV-03605·merced·Civil·Unlawful Detainer
Hearing todayAppearance required.

[ Parties’ names withheld pursuant to CCP § 1161.2(a)(1)]

Court Trial: Unlawful Detainer

Hearing date
Sep 9, 2026
Department
9
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Ruling

26CV-01752 American Express National Bank vs. Michael Sparacino

Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal - Notice of Settlement

No appearance required. The Court has reviewed the declaration submitted by Plaintiff’s counsel and notes that payments under the settlement agreement are expected through the end of April, 2028. On the Court’s own motion, the hearing on the OSC re: dismissal is continued to June 28, 2028, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 9. The clerk’s office is directed to provide notice to all parties who have appeared in this action.

26CV-02047 [Parties’ names withheld pursuant to CCP § 1161.2(a)(1)]

Status Review of Settlement

Appear to address the status of the Stipulation for Entry of Judgment filed on July 20, 2026.

26CV-02397 [Parties’ names withheld pursuant to CCP § 1161.2(a)(1)]

Court Trial

Appearance required.

26CV-03276 MERCO Credit Union vs. Vivianna Alvarez

Motion to Vacate Judgment (Small Claims)

Appearance required.

26CV-03531 [Parties’ names withheld pursuant to CCP § 1161.2(a)(1)]

Court Trial: Unlawful Detainer

Appearance required.

26CV-03605 [Parties’ names withheld pursuant to CCP § 1161.2(a)(1)]

Court Trial: Unlawful Detainer

Appearance required.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share