[ Parties’ names withheld pursuant to CCP § 1161.2(a)(1)]
Court Trial: Unlawful Detainer
Motion type
Ruling
Defendant has not met his burden of showing that his failure to file a timely response in this action to prevent the entry of default and default judgment in April 2026 was due to his “mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect.” (See Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. (b).) The Court further notes that the clerk’s judgment by default entered on April 17, 2026, was for possession of the premises only and did not include an award of money damages.
26CV-02479 [Parties’ names withheld pursuant to CCP § 1161.2(a)(1)]
Court Trial: Unlawful Detainer
Appearance required.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”