DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CECG03077·fresno·Civil·Minor's Compromise
Hearing todayGRANTED

DeKlotz v. Cockrum

Petition to Compromise Minor’s Claim of Axel DeKlotz

Hearing date
Sep 9, 2026
Department
403
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Nov 4, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffAxel DeKlotz
DefendantCockrum

Ruling

(03) Tentative Ruling

Re: DeKlotz v. Cockrum Case No. 24CECG03077

Hearing Date: September 9, 2026 (Dept. 403)

Motion: Petition to Compromise Minor’s Claim of Axel DeKlotz

Tentative Ruling:

To grant the petition to compromise the minor’s claim of Axel DeKlotz. The proposed order has been signed. The matter is off calendar. No appearances are necessary. (Code Civ. Proc., § 372, Probate Code, §§ 3500, 3600-3613.)

The court sets a status conference for Wednesday, November 4, 2026 at 3:30 pm., in Department 403, for confirmation of deposit of the minor’s funds into a blocked account. If petitioner files the Acknowledgment of Receipt of Order and Funds for Deposit in Blocked Account (MC-356) at least five court days before the hearing, the status conference will come off calendar.

Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), and Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, subdivision (a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will serve as the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order.

Tentative Ruling

Issued By: SMC on September 8, 2026. (Judge’s initials) (Date)

3

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share