DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
34-2022-00324302-CU-PA-GDS·sacramento·Civil·Personal Injury
Hearing over 1 year agoMandatory Appearance of all parties required.

Douglas Boyer vs. Blach Distributing Co, a company

Case Management Conference

Hearing date
May 23, 2025
Department
25
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffDouglas Boyer
DefendantBlach Distributing Co
DefendantJohn Doe

Ruling

34-2022-00324302-CU-PA-GDS: Douglas Boyer vs. Blach Distributing Co, a company 05/23/2025 Case Management Conference in Department 25

Tentative Ruling

Notices:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that any oral arguments regarding this tentative ruling will be heard in Department 28, located at 720 9th Street, Sacramento, CA, the Hon. Richard C. Miadich presiding. Should argument be requested by either party, the requesting party must: (1) request a hearing by calling the clerk in Department 25 at (916) 874-8727 no later than 4:00 p.m. on the Court day before the scheduled CMC, and (2) advise opposing counsel of the request. If a hearing is not requested by 4:00 p.m. on the Court day before the scheduled CMC, the tentative ruling shall become the final order of the Court.

If a hearing is requested, the Court assumes that all parties will appear remotely via Zoom unless the Court orders in-person attendance. The Department 28 Zoom ID is: 160 3906 2174. To appear telephonically via Zoom, call (833) 568-8864 and enter the Department 28 Zoom ID referenced above. ALL APPEARANCES, WHETHER REQUESTED BY A PARTY OR ORDERED BY THE COURT, WILL BE HEARD AT 9:00 A.M. IN DEPARTMENT 28 ON THE DATE OF THE SCHEDULED HEARING.

Court’s Tentative Ruling:

Mandatory Appearance of all parties required.

Parties shall appear at the hearing prepared to discuss the status of this case including unserved defendants John Doe.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share