DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25677736·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 11 months agoCONTINUED

MICHAEL NAVONE VS. RUI XIA AN ET AL

MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE ACTIONS OF CASE(S) CGC-25-628273 WITH CASE CUD-25-677736

Hearing date
Sep 25, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Oct 15, 2025

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMICHAEL NAVONE
DefendantRUI XIA AN

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25677736 - September 25, 2025 Hearing date: September 25, 2025 Case number: CUD25677736 Case title: MICHAEL NAVONE VS. RUI XIA AN ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25677736 | Case Title: | | MICHAEL NAVONE VS. RUI XIA AN ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-09-25 13:30 PM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE ACTIONS OF CASE(S) CGC-25-628273 WITH CASE CUD-25-677736 | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court motion calendar for September 25, 2025, line 13.

Defendant's Motion to Consolidate Actions of Case(s) CGC-25-628273 with Case CUD-25-677736 is continued to October 15, 2025 to be addressed if and when there is an operative complaint on file in CUD-25-677736.

This matter will be heard in department 505 by the Honorable Michelle Tong at 1:30 p.m. per the order of the presiding judge. =(505/MT)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 4132 4666; Password: 872834; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252].

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share