DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25623874·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing about 2 months agoCONTINUED

ANDREW LINTON ET AL VS. ALI A. AMINI ET AL

MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE ACTIONS OF CASE(S) CGC-25-626928 WITH CASE CGC-25-623874

Hearing date
Jul 17, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 14, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffANDREW LINTON
DefendantALI A. AMINI
DefendantVESTA ASSET MANAGEMENT INC.
DefendantPAULA GRIFFITHS

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25623874 - July 17, 2026 Hearing date: July 17, 2026 Case number: CGC25623874 Case title: ANDREW LINTON ET AL VS. ALI A. AMINI ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25623874 | Case Title: | | ANDREW LINTON ET AL VS. ALI A. AMINI ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-07-17 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE ACTIONS OF CASE(S) CGC-25-626928 WITH CASE CGC-25-623874 | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 17, 2026. Line 3.

DEFENDANT VESTA ASSET MANAGEMENT INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, PAULA GRIFFITHS MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE ACTIONS OF CASE(S) CGC-25-626928 WITH CASE CGC-25-623874 is continued to August 14, 2026 for opposing parties to provide courtesy copies of their filings in response to this motion no later than July 31, 2026 with cover letters reflecting new hearing date. (moving papers received). =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share