DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD24676907·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing about 1 year agoCONTINUED to August 25, 2025 at 9:30 a.m. Moving party to file supplemental declaration.

TIMOTHY KIM VS. ALFONSO VILLEDA ET AL

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Thereof

Hearing date
Aug 20, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 25, 2025

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Judgment rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffTIMOTHY KIM
DefendantALFONSO VILLEDA

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD24676907 - August 20, 2025 Hearing date: August 20, 2025 Case number: CUD24676907 Case title: TIMOTHY KIM VS. ALFONSO VILLEDA ET AL Case Number: | | CUD24676907 | Case Title: | | TIMOTHY KIM VS. ALFONSO VILLEDA ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-08-20 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Thereof | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Motion calendar for August 20, 2025, line 2.

Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is CONTINUED to August 25, 2025 at 9:30 a.m. No later than August 21, 2025, moving party to file a supplemental declaration regarding confirmation by plaintiff's counsel of the email address to which the moving papers were served, as this email address does not appear anywhere in the record of this action. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share