DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25677702·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 11 months agoCONTINUED

THOMAS PAINE SQUARE LLC VS. ANONA LEE ET AL

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT , Or In The Alternative, Summary Adjudication

Hearing date
Sep 30, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Oct 2, 2025

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Judgment rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffTHOMAS PAINE SQUARE LLC
DefendantANONA LEE

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25677702 - September 30, 2025 Hearing date: September 30, 2025 Case number: CUD25677702 Case title: THOMAS PAINE SQUARE LLC VS. ANONA LEE ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25677702 | Case Title: | | THOMAS PAINE SQUARE LLC VS. ANONA LEE ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-09-30 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, Or In The Alternative, Summary Adjudication | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court motion calendar for September 30, 2025, line 9.

Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication is continued to October 2, 2025 on Court's own motion. Briefing schedule remains in accordance with the original hearing date. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252]. Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share