| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Motion for Summary Judgment
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD24674175 - September 25, 2025 Hearing date: September 25, 2025 Case number: CUD24674175 Case title: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, NOT IN ITS VS. SHUMING LI ET AL Case Number: | | CUD24674175 | Case Title: | | WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, NOT IN ITS VS. SHUMING LI ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-09-25 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court motion calendar for September 25, 2025, line 8.
Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Plaintiff has failed to shift its burden by proving each element of its asserted cause of action for unlawful detainer under CCP 1161a(b)(3). (CCP 437c(p)(1).)
Plaintiff's Notice to Quit states that it is given because the defendants failed to pay rent, not because the property has been sold pursuant to a foreclosure sale. Plaintiff offers no explanation or authority for the implicit proposition that it is entitled to judgment pursuant to CCP 1161a(b)(3) based on a Notice to Quit which does not put the defendants on notice of that grounds for relief. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252].
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”