| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25625164 - August 29, 2025 Hearing date: August 29, 2025 Case number: CGC25625164 Case title: JUDY TERGIS VS. KARAN GARTNER ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25625164 | Case Title: | | JUDY TERGIS VS. KARAN GARTNER ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-08-29 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Motion calendar for August 29, 2025, line 6.
Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED with leave to amend. Plaintiff is granted leave to amend to substitute-in the proper plaintiff. Plaintiff, in her individual capacity, is not the owner of the property. (RJN, Ex. B.)
Plaintiff is also granted leave to amend her sole cause of action. In their opposition to the motion, Plaintiff claims she is asserting a cause of action for intentional interference with prospective economic relation. If that is the case, Plaintiff must label their cause of action as such and allege facts supporting each element of the cause of action. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”