DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25621467·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing about 1 year agoOFF CALENDAR. Withdrawal on file.

DEUTSCHE BANK AG, NEW YORK BRANCH, A NEW YORK VS. PINE & POWELL PARTNERS, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED ET AL

Motion For Clarification Or Alternative Request For Sua Sponte Reconsideration

Hearing date
Aug 5, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Reconsideration rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffDEUTSCHE BANK AG, NEW YORK BRANCH, A NEW YORK
DefendantPINE & POWELL PARTNERS, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25621467 - August 5, 2025 Hearing date: August 5, 2025 Case number: CGC25621467 Case title: DEUTSCHE BANK AG, NEW YORK BRANCH, A NEW YORK VS. PINE & POWELL PARTNERS, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25621467 | Case Title: | | DEUTSCHE BANK AG, NEW YORK BRANCH, A NEW YORK VS. PINE & POWELL PARTNERS, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-08-05 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion For Clarification Or Alternative Request For Sua Sponte Reconsideration; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Thereof |

Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion calendar for August 5, 2025, line 5. Plaintiff's Motion for Clarification or Alternative Request for Sua Sponte Reconsideration is OFF CALENDAR. Withdrawal on file. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share