DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC23604469·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 6 months agoOFF CALENDAR

COUNTY RECORDS RESEARCH, INC., VS. VERPRESAR LLC ET AL

MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD

Hearing date
Feb 13, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCOUNTY RECORDS RESEARCH, INC.
DefendantVERPRESAR LLC

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC23604469 - February 13, 2026 Hearing date: February 13, 2026 Case number: CGC23604469 Case title: COUNTY RECORDS RESEARCH, INC., VS. VERPRESAR LLC ET AL Case Number: | | CGC23604469 | Case Title: | | COUNTY RECORDS RESEARCH, INC., VS. VERPRESAR LLC ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-02-13 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for February 13, 2026 line 2.

DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL OF RECORD is OFF CALENDAR. Insufficient notice per CCP 1013 and 1010.6. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252]. Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share