DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24612254·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing about 1 year agoGRANTED

JUAN ROSALES VS. PAUL H. NATHAN JR. ET AL

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO File Second Amended Complaint

Hearing date
Aug 1, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJUAN ROSALES
DefendantPAUL H. NATHAN JR.

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC24612254 - August 1, 2025 Hearing date: August 1, 2025 Case number: CGC24612254 Case title: JUAN ROSALES VS. PAUL H. NATHAN JR. ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24612254 | Case Title: | | JUAN ROSALES VS. PAUL H. NATHAN JR. ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-08-01 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR LEAVE TO File Second Amended Complaint | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion calendar for August 1, 2025, line 3.

Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint is GRANTED. Plaintiff to file a Second Amended Complaint forthwith. The parties are encouraged to seek a stipulated trial continuance in Dept. 206. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share