DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC23610891·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 9 months agoOFF CALENDAR. Insufficient notice per CCP 1005.

SARAH LEWIS VS. KENNETH RUNYON ET AL

Application And Notice Of Motion To Continue Hearing On Defendants Motions To Compel And For Monetary Sanctions

Hearing date
Dec 5, 2025
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSARAH LEWIS
DefendantKENNETH RUNYON

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC23610891 - December 5, 2025 Hearing date: December 5, 2025 Case number: CGC23610891 Case title: SARAH LEWIS VS. KENNETH RUNYON ET AL Case Number: | | CGC23610891 | Case Title: | | SARAH LEWIS VS. KENNETH RUNYON ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-12-05 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Application And Notice Of Motion To Continue Hearing On Defendants Motions To Compel And For Monetary Sanctions | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for December 5, 2025. Line 3.3.

PLAINTIFF SARAH LEWIS Application And Notice Of Motion To Continue Hearing On Defendants Motions To Compel And For Monetary Sanctions; is OFF CALENDAR. Insufficient notice per CCP 1005. =(501/AAT)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share