DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC23608560·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 11 months agoGRANTED. Amended Answer (containing all pages) shall be filed and served forthwith.

366 GEARY STREET, LLC, ET AL VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL

Motion For Order Allowing Filing Of Amended Answer

Hearing date
Sep 15, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

Plaintiff366 GEARY STREET, LLC
DefendantCITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC23608560 - September 15, 2025 Hearing date: September 15, 2025 Case number: CGC23608560 Case title: 366 GEARY STREET, LLC, ET AL VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL Case Number: | | CGC23608560 | Case Title: | | 366 GEARY STREET, LLC, ET AL VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-09-15 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion For Order Allowing Filing Of Amended Answer | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Sept 15, 2025. Line 2.1.

DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Motion For Order Allowing Filing Of Amended Answer is GRANTED. Amended Answer (containing all pages) shall be filed and served forthwith. =(501/SKF)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share