DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC23603968·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 12 months agoDENIED without prejudice

CAMILA DE ANDRADE BIANCHI ET AL VS. VALERIE MCCARTHY ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Enforce Settlement Agreement And Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Of Motion

Hearing date
Aug 21, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCAMILA DE ANDRADE BIANCHI
DefendantVALERIE MCCARTHY

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC23603968 - August 21, 2025 Hearing date: August 21, 2025 Case number: CGC23603968 Case title: CAMILA DE ANDRADE BIANCHI ET AL VS. VALERIE MCCARTHY ET AL Case Number: | | CGC23603968 | Case Title: | | CAMILA DE ANDRADE BIANCHI ET AL VS. VALERIE MCCARTHY ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-08-21 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Enforce Settlement Agreement And Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Of Motion |

Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Motion calendar for August 21, 2025, line 1. Plaintiffs' Motion to Enforce Settlement is DENIED without prejudice. There is no competent evidence of breach; Plaintiff's only evidence is counsel's conclusory statement that "Defendants did not make the June 1, 2025 payment or the July 1, 2025 payment[.]" (Ellson Decl. 10). =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share