DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC22602598·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing about 1 year agoTRANSFERRED to be heard in Dept. 301 on August 21, 2025 at 9:00 am

SUNHILL ENTERPRICES, LP VS. YOONGI KAN TOM ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Have Stipulated Judgment Signed And Entered By The Court

Hearing date
Aug 14, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 21, 2025

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSUNHILL ENTERPRICES, LP
DefendantYOONGI KAN TOM

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC22602598 - August 14, 2025 Hearing date: August 14, 2025 Case number: CGC22602598 Case title: SUNHILL ENTERPRICES, LP VS. YOONGI KAN TOM ET AL Case Number: | | CGC22602598 | Case Title: | | SUNHILL ENTERPRICES, LP VS. YOONGI KAN TOM ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-08-14 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Have Stipulated Judgment Signed And Entered By The Court; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Motion calendar for August 14, 2025, line 3.

Plaintiff's Motion to Have Stipulated Judgment Signed and Entered by the Court is TRANSFERRED to be heard in Dept. 301 on August 21, 2025 at 9:00 am, per order of the Presiding Judge. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share