DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26PSCV02774·la·Civil·Personal Injury
Hearing in 1 dayGRANTED

Luis Antonio Garduno v. Allen Yu

Motion to be Relieved as Counsel

Hearing date
Sep 9, 2026
Department
6
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PlaintiffLuis Antonio Garduno
DefendantAllen Yu

Attorneys

Kayla Radnia(KR Law, APC)for Plaintiff

Ruling

be alleged to cure these defects. T he Court GRANTS Defendant Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center's M otion to Strike in its entirety.

That portion of Paragraph 22 of First Cause of Action - "as well as attorneys' fees" and that portion of Paragraph 3 of Prayer for Relief - "Attorney's fees and" are hereby stricken.

The Court will hear from Plaintiff whether there are facts that can be alleged to cure these defects. Defendant PVHMC is ordered to give notice of the Court's ruling within five calendar days of this order.

Garduno v. Allen Yu Motion of Kayla Radnia of KR Law, APC to be Relieved as Counsel for Plaintiff Luis Antonio Garduno

The Court GRANTS the motion of Kayla Radnia of KR Law, APC to be relieved as counsel for Plaintiff Luis Antonio Garduno. Counsel must submit a completely filled out proposed order prior to the hearing. Counsel must then serve the signed order on Plaintiff and file proof of service of same within five calendar days of this order. Counsel is ordered to give notice of the Court's ruling within five calendar days of this order.

BACKGROUND

This is a personal injury case arising out of a motor vehicle accident. On August 10, 2026, plaintiff Luis Antonio Garduno (Plaintiff) filed this action against defendant Allen Yu (Defendant) and Does 1 through 50, alleging a single cause of action for negligence. On August 18, 2026, Kayla Radnia of KR Law, APC moved to be relieved as counsel for Plaintiff Luis Antonio Garduno. The motion is unopposed.

LEGAL STANDARD

The Court has discretion to allow an attorney to withdraw, and such a motion should be granted, provided that there is no prejudice to the client, and it does not disrupt the orderly process of justice. (See Ramirez v. Sturdevant (1994) 21 Cal.App.4th 904, 915; People v. Prince (1968) 268 Cal.App.2d 398, 403-407.)

A motion to be relieved as counsel must be made on Judicial Council Form MC-051 (Notice of Motion and Motion), MC-052 (Declaration), and MC-053 (Proposed Order). (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1362, subds. (a), (c), (e).) The requisite forms must be served "on the client and on all parties that have appeared in the case." (Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 3.1362, subd. (d).)

DISCUSSION

Counsel has submitted a properly completed application, declaration, and proposed order on Judicial Council forms MC-051, MC-052, and MC-053. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1362, subds. (a), (c), (e).) The Court finds that good cause exists and there is no prejudice to Plaintiff, and that the relief sought does not disrupt the orderly process of justice. Based on the foregoing, the Court GRANTS the motion.

CONCLUSION

The Court GRANTS the motion of Kayla Radnia of KR Law, APC to be relieved as counsel for Plaintiff Luis Antonio Garduno. Counsel must submit a completely filled out proposed order prior to the hearing. Counsel must then serve the signed order on Plaintiff and file proof of service of same within five calendar days of this order. Counsel is ordered to give notice of the Court's ruling within five calendar days of this order. | Home -->)" -->

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share