All cases
22CV009453·alameda·Civil·Settlement ComplianceHearing todayIf the parties do not appear, the court will dismiss the case without prejudice and maintain jurisdiction under CCP 664.6.
LAM, et al. vs SMITH, et al.
Order to Show Cause Re: Compliance (Settlement)
Motion type
Parties
PlaintiffLAM
DefendantSMITH
Ruling
22CV009453: LAM, et al. vs SMITH, et al. 09/04/2026 Order to Show Cause Re: Compliance (Settlement) in Department 17
Tentative Ruling - 08/26/2026 Chad A. Stegeman
If the parties do not appear, the court will dismiss the case without prejudice and maintain jurisdiction under CCP 664.6.
Zoom Link
https://www.zoomgov.com/j/16146216257 Meeting ID: 161 4621 6257
Cited authorities
Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.