DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26STCV07514·la·Civil·Other
Hearing todayGRANTED

Mesriani Law Group v. Merus, Inc.

Application to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice

Hearing date
Sep 4, 2026
Department
516
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMesriani Law Group
DefendantMerus, Inc.
DefendantMerus Case, LLC
DefendantLegalTech, LLC

Ruling

Case No.: 26STCV07514 Matter: Application to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice Moving Party: Defendants Merus Case, LLC and LegalTech, LLC Responding Party: None Tentative Ruling: The Application to be admitted pro hac vice is granted.

Defendants Merus Case, LLC and LegalTech, LLC, apply for an order granting David F. Pustilnik admission to appear pro hac vice on their behalf. The application is unopposed. Defendants have complied with all procedural and statutory requirements. Thus, the Court grants David F. Pustilnik's application to appear on behalf of Defendants Merus Case, LLC and LegalTech, LLC.

I. Montgomery Department 516 Hearing Date: September 4, 2026 Case Name: Chan v. Matthew doing business as Pain Management Care

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share