MeriCal, LLC vs. Green Jeeva, LLC

102 Kim A. Le vs. United Medical Imaging, Inc.

2017-00962710 Final Accounting The court finds all settlement distribution efforts are fully concluded. The administrator’s final report (ROA 510) is thus approved, and the court’s file will be closed. Plaintiff to give notice of the court’s ruling, including to the LWDA, within five (5) calendar days, and file proof of service. Plaintiff to also file proof of service of ROA 510 on the LWDA. 103 Walter vs. Capo Beach Healthcare, LLC

2024-01409294 Final Accounting

Plaintiff Joan S. Walter’s Final Accounting hearing is CONTINUED to March 4, 2027, at 2:00 p.m. in Department CX102 to confirm that the amount of the uncashed funds after the check-cashing deadline have been delivered to the State Controller’s Office Unclaimed Property Fund in the names of the applicable payees, that the administrator’s work is complete, and that the Court’s file thus may be closed. All supporting papers must be filed at least sixteen (16) court days before the continued hearing date. If the settlement funds are not completely disbursed by the report deadline, Class Counsel must request a continuance. Failure to do so may result in the issuance of an Order to Show Cause re Monetary Sanctions.

Plaintiff is ordered to give notice of this ruling to Defendant. 104 MeriCal, LLC vs. Green Jeeva, LLC

2026-01548478 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice

Defendant/Cross-Complainant Green Jeeva, LLC’s application for pro hac vice admission of attorney Jason D. Smith is GRANTED.

On or before the anniversary of the date of this order, if this attorney remains counsel for the moving party, the moving party must pay an annual renewal fee of five hundred dollars ($500) for each year that the attorney maintains pro hac vice status in this case. (Gov. Code, § 70617, subd. (e)(2).)

Moving party shall provide notice. 105 DMS 2 LLC vs. Levecke Corporation

2023-01360387 1. Demurrer to Amended Complaint 2. Case Management Conference

Defendant Kercsmar & Feltus’s (“K&S”) Demurrer to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint is OVERRULED.

Meet and Confer Requirement As an initial matter, Plaintiff DMS 2 LLC contends that K&S failed to comply with the meet-and-confer requirements of Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) section 430.41 for the demurrer because the meet-and-confer correspondence cited by K&S in its motion were from August 2025, which related to Plaintiff’s previous motion for leave to file the second amended