DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24STCV23710·la·Civil·Civil
Hearing todayThe sealing issue must be resolved, and the evidentiary record finalized, before the Court can reach the merits of the motion.

Unknown v. Unknown

Motion to seal

Hearing date
Sep 4, 2026
Department
514
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Ruling

(Stanley Mosk Courthouse: Dept. 514) September 4, 2026 DEPARTMENT 514 LAW AND MOTION RULINGS

The Court will hear from counsel on all matters, including (but not limited to) the following: do the matters at issue, including the questions of vested rights, due process, and estoppel, require factual development in this particular case, or can they be adjudicated on the pleadings? Case Number: 24STCV23710 Hearing Date: September 4, 2026 Dept: 514 The Court will call this matter. Redacted documents have been filed, but no application or motion to seal appears in the Court's records. Is any party moving to seal any document?

If not, may all documents now be filed in unredacted form? The sealing issue must be resolved, and the evidentiary record finalized, before the Court can reach the merits of the motion. Case Number: 24STCV25392 Hearing Date: September 4, 2026 Dept: 514 The three motions to compel initial responses and the motion for a deemed-admitted order are denied. Plaintiff served responses to the discovery at issue before these motions were filed. If Plaintiff's objections are without merit (as Defendant contends), Defendant's remedy is to file a timely motion to compel further responses (after meeting and conferring in person, by telephone, or video conference, as required by statute).

Moving party is ordered to give notice. | Home -->)" -->

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share