3324-3330 19TH STREET OWNERS ASSOCIATION VS. NINETEENTH STREET PARTNERS LLC ET AL
MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC26633599 - September 3, 2026 Hearing date: September 3, 2026 Case number: CGC26633599 Case title: 3324-3330 19TH STREET OWNERS ASSOCIATION VS. NINETEENTH STREET PARTNERS LLC ET AL Case Number: | | CGC26633599 | Case Title: | | 3324-3330 19TH STREET OWNERS ASSOCIATION VS. NINETEENTH STREET PARTNERS LLC ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-09-03 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for September 3, 2026. Line 4.
DEFENDANT GORDON KULLBERG & SON INC. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, MARK KULLBERG MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT is GRANTED with leave to amend for Plaintiff to allege facts (not conclusions) to support the request for punitive damages. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”