DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25623043·sf·Civil·Contract
Hearing 11 months agoSustains the demurrer with leave to amend as to the sixth cause of action for violations of the Unfair Competition Law; sustains the demurrer without leave to amend as to the ninth COA for contribution; sustains the demurrer with leave to amend as to all COAs against Ash; and otherwise overrules the demurrer.

IRONRIDGE, INC. VS. PAUL ZACHER STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS, INC. ET AL

DEMURRER to CROSS COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Sep 30, 2025
Department
301
Prevailing
Mixed

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PlaintiffIRONRIDGE, INC.
PlaintiffJON ASH
DefendantPAUL ZACHER STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS, INC.
DefendantPAUL ZACHER

Ruling

Matter on the Law & Motion / Discovery calendar for Tuesday, September 30, 2025, Line 9, CROSS-DEFENDANTS IRONRIDGE, INC., AND JON ASH'S DEMURRER TO CROSS-COMPLAINT.

IronRidge, Inc. and Jon Ash demur to the cross-complaint of Paul Zacher Structural Engineers, Inc. and Paul Zacher (collectively, PZSE). For the reasons stated herein, the court sustains the demurrer with leave to amend as to the sixth cause of action (COA) for violations of the Unfair Competition Law; sustains the demurrer without leave to amend as to the ninth COA for contribution; sustains the demurrer with leave to amend as to all COAs against Ash; and otherwise overrules the demurrer. The court issues an order to PZSE to show cause why it should not be sanctioned for multiple erroneous citations. (The court's complete tentative ruling has been emailed to the parties.)

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(301/CVA) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share